On the one hand,evidence criteria of public persecution are not an independent issue in theory;on the other hand,evidence criteria of public persecution in China and foreign countries are not in a common line of good or bad,and all of them obeys the logic of the legality and effectiveness of the right of public persecution.

On that basis, through summing up the legislative intentions and primary characteristics behind these two standards, analyzing and comparing the common ground and the differences between them, a conclusion has been educed, that is, the evidence standard of prosecution adopted by a country correlates closely with this country s procedure model and legal culture tradition, even more determined .

It is a hot topic in the fields of theory and practice how to confine the relationship between the proof standard of public prosecution and the proof standard of conviction.

With the reform of public prosecutor system,it is essential to establish the standards of criminal evidence.

The prosecution proof standard and the prosecution standard are not the identical conception,the prosecution standard must measure the public interests and the criminal policy.