Divergences of the criticism on the novel reside mainly in its ambivalence andambiguity as a result of Forster s "double vision", and its happy, but unconvincingending that seems to embody the ultimate and comprehensive "connection" of allthose opposing forces which Forster has discerned in modern society.

Her identity both as a critic and a writer offers her a unique double vision, which enables Byatt to write novels that display her considerable expertise in narrative technique and in-depth insight into contemporary academia.

The overlapping entering the stage provides a double perspective of intervention of the literature and art of anthropology and the anthropology of literature and art to comprehend the poetics of anthropology of literature and art completely.