Judgment by default is conducted while one of the parties has been absent, which has gradually come into being in the long run and formed two judgment modes of default system ism and one party debating ism.

Via its development, there are two modes of trial by default: default judgment mode and ex-prate debate judgment mode.

Litigation deficiencies in our present system of verdict by default have brought about misuses and abuses in judicial practice.

It is proved by practice that judgment by default is an important, practicable legal system in the process of trial in civil and administrative judgment practice.

Judgment by default is conducted while one of the parties has been absent, which has gradually come into being in the long run and formed two judgment modes of default system ism and one party debating ism.

In case one of parties is absent, how to maximize the realization of the justness and efficiency in lawsuits is differently stipulated in the system of judgment by default of varied countries worldwide.

The Construction of Trial by Default in Criminal Lawsuit of Our Country;

This article probes into three basic theoretical issues of the system of trial by default of the administrative lawsuit: its aim, function and legislative ideal.

In order to conclude criminal procedure and raise the efficiency of it, many countries stipulate that criminal trial by default is an exception of participate principle.