1) public audit
公开审计
2) private audit
不公开审计
3) public review
公开审稿
1.
This paper makes contrasts between review patterns of academic journals, namely, the contrasts between specialist review and editor review, dual anonymous review and public review, and individual review and multiple review.
通过对学术期刊几种审稿方式:专家审稿和编辑审稿,匿名审稿和公开审稿,个体审稿和多人审稿的优劣对比分析,指出采用不同审稿方式应注意的问题,以便在审稿实践中灵活运用审稿方式。
4) open trial
公开审判
1.
We should deeply understand it under the current situation of our country s jurisdiction,and find the golden section ratio of the principle of"open trial",thus to construct its concrete systems and make the best use of it.
"公开审判"是我国宪法规定的基本原则,并在三大诉讼法中也得到确立。
2.
There are conflicts between the open trial system and the right of privacy protection,especially in the trial of the divorce cases concerning the litigant s right of privacy.
公开审判制度与隐私权保护存在冲突,尤其在离婚案件的审判中,更多涉及到当事人的隐私权。
3.
The present law does not have a detailed regulation on open trial.
长期以来,理论界和实务界对公开审判的认识还不全面,现行立法对公开审判的规定较为粗陋,加之主、客观方面的原因,公开审判原则未能得到有效的贯彻和落实。
5) public trial
审判公开
1.
In order to push on reform of court system and guarantee judicial justice, this paper puts forward some opinions on reform of court system, such as exchange of service ideas, improvement of judge s professional quantities ,carrying out public trial and strengthen modernized construction and so on.
为积极推进法院改革、确保司法公正、全面发挥各项审判职能 ,提出了法院改革应注重观念的转变、应注重对法官的素质教育、应实现审判公开、应实现庭审手段现代化几点看法。
2.
Public trial is an essential characteristic of modern judicial system.
审判公开是现代司法制度的基本特征。
3.
After inspecting the defects of public trial in judicial application of China,the writer analyses the reasons and gives proposals for perfection of this system.
正视我国公开审判制度在司法实践中存在的问题,分析影响我国审判公开的原因,进而提出进一步完善公开审判制度的建议。
6) Open Trial
审判公开
1.
The article plans to trace the open trial principle s historical development path,definite scientifically the meaning of open tria.
审判公开是司法审判制度的一项基本原则,在人类历史上闪烁着正义之光,它彻底抛弃旧有的愚昧、践踏人权、封建专制的秘密审判方式,发扬诉讼民主和增强社会监督,实现社会公正,增强人们对国家司法制度的信任度。
补充资料：审计人员执行审计监督权时有不受干涉的权利
审计人员执行审计监督权时有不受干涉的权利：审记人员执行审记机关的审记监督权,任何行政机关、社会团体和个人不得干涉其独立行使职权，审记人员依法执行职务，受法律保护。任何组织个人不得拒绝审记人员依法执行职务，不得打击报复审记人员。
说明：补充资料仅用于学习参考，请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条