The justification of claims in rem provides solid foundation for the exercise of it.

In the system of civil rights,the right of obligatory claim aims at guarding the right for property as well as the right of the real claim.

There are real right doctrine,creditor s right doctrine and independent claim doctrine on the subject of the nature of right of the real claim in legal theory.

The right of the real claim is the right of claim, which gives the holder of the right in rem the remedy.

Although claim of right in rem succeeds to the function of proceeding and implements with the help of action,claim of right in rem is independent of the action,which is as like a bridge connecting substantial law with proceeding law and assures the claim of right in rem smooth imple.

Adopting the mode of tortuous liability instead of claim of right in rem will cause the effect of retrocession impotent, thus on the occasion of selling other s property and tackling lost-and-found objects and drifts, the law will encounter an embarrassment.

During the draft of real property law in China, theirs different ideas on whether the claim of right in rem should apply action limitation.

The academic controversy over the nature of the right of real claim is attributed to the method of analysis which restrictedly focuses on the formal logic of the right.

Right of real claim is an unique system of real rights protection in continental law system, which is an important part of property law.

Writing this article is for the sake of disorder in realizing the Legal nature ofclaim of real right.

The claim of real right is important content of real right.

Research on the Theoretical Problems of Petition Right on Property;

Petition right on property is an important concept of Property right law in civil law system, providing the most direct protection for Property right.